Amrita and Kaavya went to a reputed Bar in greater kailash owned by Kaavya ‘s Ex-boyfriend. Both the woman are in endless happiness as they wish to celebrate India’s victory  in a cricket match , which they just witnessed. Both ordered the same drink. Amrita is a frequent drinker where as Kaavya is not so frequent. So naturally , When Amrita finished three rounds, Kaavya could be able to finish just one round.  Alas!

After a few minutes Kaavya died. Police detective has been called in , who declared “its a murder”.

How? Both the women drank the same brand of drink from the same bottle. Amrita drank more, precisely finished 3 rounds in which Kaavya had finished just one round. Then?

So be yourself Detective and solve how Kaavya died.

FATAL ATTRACTION OR INFATUATION? Who is the murder?

Neeraja is a most beautiful & attractive lady but yet un-married , due to her egoistic behaviour., age 32. She had no father but had a younger sister . That day Neeraja’s mother expired and after burial , a congregation was being held. There Neeraja saw a most handsome young man of marvelous physic. Neeraja at once fell in love with him and attracted to him like a magnet. But Neeraja never saw him before anywhere or during Sunday prayers nor at any function. As Neeraja fully engulfed in her thoughts about the man., the father of the Church solemnised the rituals and everybody dispersed. But Neeraja mind and eyes are searching for him , in spite of her well wishers consoling her and preaching her about her future responsibilities. Nothing is going into her mind. Her eyes are restlessly searching for the disappeared handsome man. 

Days are ticking, Neeraja unable to forget her hero and all her enquiries about him have not yielded, a single clue. Contrary to her situation, her younger sister is very upset  over the loss of her mother and became moody and unaware of her sister’s flight. About one month passed. Neeraja telephoned to the son of the Church father, kaushik who once relentlessly expressed his love towards her,  but all the time Neeraja refused his proposals. So kaushik overjoyed on receiving a call from his dreamgirl and reached her home. Then Neeraja told him the purpose of her call and promised Kaushik that if he find out the where abouts of that “Handsome man” , she would convince her sister to marry him. This was a big shock for Kaushik and he was upset and felt angry. He refused her proposal saying he is more interested in her than her sister. As a result a serious argument and quarrel broke out between them and Kaushik left Neeraja’s house with high disappointment and dejected mind. 

Few days passed away. The father of the Church received a call about Neeraja’s sister sudden demise. Police informed the Father that it was a murder.

((((((((()))))))

Who murdered Neeraja’s sister? Be a detective & findout.

POISONOUS PILLS.

Suresh kothari is one of the richest Business man of the City. That day his Birthday. So all the wealthiest and powerful people attended the grand birthday celebrations and liquor flowed like a stream. As it  past 12 o clock in the midnight, the guests slowly departed and only four of the close friends remained with Suresh Kothari. Each one competes richer than the other one and so now the game began and as per the pre agreed plan,  each person brought his cheque book.

Now Suresh Kothari explained the game. As per the game , he signed a cheque with ₹5 Crore amount and put it on the centre table. Similarly all other four have also signed their cheques with similar amount and put them  on the table. Then Suresh explained to his friends that he will give two pills to each one them including himself. Each one of them has to choose only one tablet and swallow it. The pill opens their kismat or badluck as out of the two tablets, only one is laced with mild anesthesia. Those who took anasthesia tablet and fainted will be losers of the game. Who didn't choose the tablet  with anasthesia and not fainted are the winners of   all the cheques and its total amount. To keep transparency in the game, some tablets are placed in a bowl and each one took two tablets and gave   them to the other person. Then each one of them swallowed one tablet with a glass of water  as per their choice. Soon all have fainted.,.and after some time as each one of them opened their eyes one by one with some time duration,

Suresh Kothari is already

Awake. As such Suresh kothari grabbed all the cheques and won ₹25 Crores. The losers congratulated Kothari and left for their homes dejected. But one of the four friends suspected something fishy and took the help of a Detective friend by name Varun Tej. Varun  immediately rushed to Kothari's House and confronted him. But Kothari pleaded for  innocence by saying  every thing played in sheer transparency,  as the tablets were not self chosen and randomly distributed by each one them. However the Detective opened the secrecy of the game and proved Kothari's foul game in front of his friends.

(((((((((((((()))))))))))

So be yourself the Detective and logically explain how Kothari did foul play.

POISONOUS PILLS.

Suresh kothari is one of the richest Business man of the City. That day his Birthday. So all the wealthiest and powerful people attended the grand birthday celebrations and liquor flowed like a stream. As it  past 12 o clock in the midnight, the guests slowly departed and only four of the close friends remained with Suresh Kothari. Each one competes richer than the other one and so now the game began and as per the pre agreed plan,  each person brought his cheque book.

Now Suresh Kothari explained the game. As per the game , he signed a cheque with ₹5 Crore amount and put it on the centre table. Similarly all other four have also signed their cheques with similar amount and put them  on the table. Then Suresh explained to his friends that he will give two pills to each one them including himself. Each one of them has to choose only one tablet and swallow it. The pill opens their kismat or badluck as out of the two tablets, only one is laced with mild anesthesia. Those who took anasthesia tablet and fainted will be losers of the game. Who didn't choose the tablet  with anasthesia and not fainted are the winners of   all the cheques and its total amount. To keep transparency in the game, some tablets are placed in a bowl and each one took two tablets and gave   them to the other person. Then each one of them swallowed one tablet with a glass of water  as per their choice. Soon all have fainted.,.and after some time as each one of them opened their eyes one by one with some time duration,

Suresh Kothari is already

Awake. As such Suresh kothari grabbed all the cheques and won ₹25 Crores. The losers congratulated Kothari and left for their homes dejected. But one of the four friends suspected something fishy and took the help of a Detective friend by name Varun Tej. Varun  immediately rushed to Kothari's House and confronted him. But Kothari pleaded for  innocence by saying  every thing played in sheer transparency,  as the tablets were not self chosen and randomly distributed by each one them. However the Detective opened the secrecy of the game and proved Kothari's foul game in front of his friends.

(((((((((((((()))))))))))

So be yourself the Detective and logically explain how Kothari did foul play.

Who murdered the Chemist?

Police received a phone call informing that a Chemist had been found dead in the Laboratory of a pharmaceutical company.  After a hectic day work, Crime Branch Detective Jitendra is just about to leave the office when the call was received. He immediately rushed to the crime scene and started  investigations during which, he found,  at a corner of the table,  a small piece of paper,  on which it was written hastily & awkwardly some chemical compound names as nickel , carbon oxigen, lanthanum and silver. During Interrogations he found that four people have visited the Chemist and spent some time. They are , his co-worker Clair, his boss David, Quality Controller Nicholas and Accounts Assistant lavanya.  Every one has their genuine reason and purpose of meeting the Chemist.  For Detective Jitendra no one seems suspicious and there is no physical damages, heavy foot prints or any other marks of physical struggle in the Laboratory. Detective Jitendra looked casually at the piece of  paper in his hand & Immediately ordered to arrest the murderer.

(((((((((((((()))))))))))

So be a detective and found the murderer in tune with Detective Jitendra.

A man’s body was found dead in his flat. He lives single there and when the police arrived, the flat door is widely open. The body was first seen by a news paper boy who intimated to the RWA.

The police observed that the body was lying flat on the floor with a Portable Casette Recorder in one hand and a revolver in another hand. Police suspected it as a suicide as per the first information received by them that the man  had incurred heavy losses in Business. Detective Jitendra is also called in. The detective observed the scene closely & pressed the play on button on the recorder which played “I am finished. Nothing else to live for. I can’t go on” soon after the words the sound of a gunshot was heard. It is established that the voice belongs to the man. It is a clear cut suicide case sir, said the inspector to the Detective. Jitendra nodded his head negatively and declared that it was a “murder.” 

What is your logic to prove that it was a Murder in tune with the Detective Jitendra.

It was a hot summer afternoon of May, Saturday 3 PM. Due to the scorching heat , the traffic on the road is very less , that too East of kailash is being a posh locality, you can’t expect much huzzle buzzle. But all of a sudden , shattering the silence, A police vehicle with blazing siren stopped in front of ‘Amrapali’ , one of the most beautiful buildings in the locality owned by Jagadish. Police entered the  house and enquired Vanitha , wife of Jagadish, the landlord, the reason for calling the police. She told the police that, there is theft in her house and robbers took away all her jewellery and money,  just in a couple hours, as she locked her house and went to a near by Supermarket . She also claimed that she had returned within two hours. Police found the safe vault is open and empty. On enquiry  police came to know that only Vanitha is present in the house on that day. as her husband Jagdish left on business trip. The Gardener and his wife both are not in the house at the time of the robbery,  as the Gardener went to his native place,  Gurgaon on personal work by taking permission and his wife Sunitha , who does all the household duties in the house , went to see a movie along with the neighbours maid by taking permission of Vanitha. Police called the Gardener for questionning . In the meantime the maid also returned from the movie and started crying , on hearing what had happened. Police started questioning both the servants separately but Vanitha supported them saying they are very honest and reliable couple working with them since 15 years. But  they know entire topography of the house  with what is where. There is no break-in into the house, or no signs of forcible entry. Robber or robbers have free entry and knew very well the location of keys of the almirah and safe vault. Vanitha also admitted that she has not bolted a secrete back door under the staircase,  which is known only to few individuals. She admitted that she kept it open , so that the maid on returning from the movie , can straight away goto kitchen for work  in her absence. A neighbour informed the police that he had seen a man who came on a black Motorcycle,  & pressing the calling bell. He also informed that he had not seen that  man when he left, as he went inside of his house to attend a phone call. But Vanitha said

That might be Ravinder , their close family friend for the last 12 years and also business partner. The police called Ravinder who came immediately and denied his involvement. Vanitha took stand for him. The police duly informed  Vanitha’s husband also. In the meantime , Detective Jitendra arrived on the scene. The inspector told the detective, that there are only three prime suspects in this case , but all are sided by Vanitha. No entry of anybody else and no signs of breaking of any thing and so clearly the work of an insider. The inspector expressed his doubt on Vanitha saying she might be creating a drama. The detective during the interrogation , asked the family member about his purpose of visiting to the house. Ravinder told the detective that he came to a near by bank and after completing his work , made a courtecy visit to the house and since no body opened the door, he went away. The detective failed to get any clue from others also. “A very hard nut to crack”  Sir, said the inspector to the detective . Jitendra nodded his head affirmativevely while glancing at the wall. Suddenly a flash of thought striked his brain. He asked the  inspector to arrest Ravinder,  who ultimately agreed to the crime.

So think as detective and tell how jitendra found out the family member , as the culprit.

Is the judgement correct? [Terminology: Prosecution lawyer : works against guilty, criminals, accused.

Defence Lawyer: works for the accused.

Public Lawyer: same as prosecution lawyer. Works for people/government]

*

Police arrested a woman on murder charges and presented in the court. The allegation on the women is , she murdered her husband and hid the body somewhere and police could not find out. The woman pleaded before the judge , that she is innocent and the police falsely implicated her. She also told the judge that she loves her husband very much and missing him a lot. The prosecution lawyer in his argument said that the woman is of bad character and her husband’s where abouts are not known , inspite of their exhaustive search efforts , and so , she should be prosecuted , on the belief that she is lying & not innocent . The defence lawyer argued that the police and the court are acting on their belief without any concrete evidence. He also surprised the court by announcing that he got information that her husband is very much alive and on his way to the court and may appear there at any moment. On hearing this , every one including the jury started looking towards the door…..

Minutes gone by but no trace of the Husband. Then the defence lawyer continued his argument by saying that when the police and jury firmly believe & sure of his client  as murderer of  her husband, why they looked at the door ? as everybody knows that a killed person does not come to life again. Thus he strongly put forward his argument that the woman is innocent and  may be acquitted , as the charges against her are the imagination of the police. 

However , the judge sentenced the woman for murdering her husband.

Slightly surprised, the police inspector asked his crime branch detective jitendra, about the logic behind the judgement . 

The detective explained to the inspector what would have prompted the Judge to sentence the woman ? in the absence of circumstantial evidence.

So what prompted the Judge in deciding the woman as culprit, according to Detective words.?

BE YOURSELF DETECTIVE SERIES-9.

Theft or Oversmart?

*

A couple went for overseas tour for about one month. Before going on tour, the wife put all her jewellery in a non traditional safe place. They lacked all the rooms    except Hall and kitchen and kept the keys with them. The keys of the main building and gate were given to a trust worthy neighbour to look after the house and garden. After about one month; they returned and  then  the woman made a complaint to the police  that all her jewellery was stolen. There is no break- in into to the house by anybody. The neighbour said he is innocent and no idea where the landlady kept jewellery. He also told that,  just before the couple's arrival, he got the  house cleaned by his servants. The police suspects the neighbour or one of the servant might be the robberer. Detective Jitendra called in and after thorough questioning , he declared that there is no robbery and neither the neighbour nor the cleaning staff steal the jewellery. It is the Oversmartness of the  lady for disappearance of the Jewellery. How

(((((((((((())))))))

Be yourself detective and explain how jewellery disappeared?

BE YOURSELF DETECTIVE SERIES -10

Detective Riddle.

A story from 1996. 

A woman shoot her husband and kept him under chemical water for five minutes in the morning.

A friend of her , watched her and her husband at a movie theatre hand in hand.

How?